All tasks / Comparisons

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5

Compared only on public benchmark results, across the 9 tasks where both are listed: Claude Fable 5.1 is a tier higher in 1 of 9 shared tasks, Claude Opus 5.5 in 2, they share a tier in 4.

Claude Fable 5.1

Anthropic's highest-priced Claude tier, positioned for demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic work.

Vendor
Anthropic
Weights
Closed: API and apps only
Released
1 Sep 2026
API price
$10 in / $50 out per 1M tokens
License
proprietary
Last verified
18 Oct 2026

Alternatives to Claude Fable 5.1

Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic's Opus-tier Claude model for long-running agentic coding and knowledge work.

Vendor
Anthropic
Weights
Closed: API and apps only
Released
22 Sep 2026
API price
$4 in / $20 out per 1M tokens
License
proprietary
Last verified
18 Oct 2026

Alternatives to Claude Opus 5.5

Task by task

TaskClaude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 5.5Higher tier
Chat & assistants
Models
S1,502 on LMArena Text Arena (overall, style control) · CloudS1,508 on LMArena Text Arena (overall, style control) · CloudSame tier
Search & research
Models
S1,233 on LMArena Search Arena (style control) · CloudA1,211 on LMArena Search Arena (style control) · CloudClaude Fable 5.1
Writing
Models
S1,485 on LMArena Text Arena: Creative Writing (style control) · CloudS1,519 on LMArena Text Arena: Creative Writing (style control) · CloudSame tier
Documents & OCR
Models
–No public result yet · Cloud–No public result yet · Cloud—
Coding
Models
A1,742 on LMArena WebDev / Code Arena (overall) · CloudS1,806 on LMArena WebDev / Code Arena (overall) · CloudClaude Opus 5.5
Image understanding
Models
S1,286 on LMArena Vision Arena (overall, style control) · CloudS1,293 on LMArena Vision Arena (overall, style control) · CloudSame tier
Vector graphics & logos
Models
C1,300 on Design Arena SVG · CloudC1,332 on Design Arena SVG · CloudSame tier
Browser & computer agents
Models
–No public result yet · Cloud–No public result yet · Cloud—
Workflow automation
Models
C59.4% on AutomationBench-AA (Artificial Analysis) · CloudA69.5% on AutomationBench-AA (Artificial Analysis) · CloudClaude Opus 5.5

A tier spans a range of scores, and small gaps on a leaderboard are often within its margin of error, so only a different tier counts as ahead. How we rank.

Same benchmark, both results

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 5.5Snapshot
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Composite index over Artificial Analysis' own evaluation suite, higher is better
535818 Oct 2026
AutomationBench-AA (Artificial Analysis)
Score: average share of each task's objectives completed across 657 business-workflow tasks in 40 simulated SaaS apps via REST APIs; a task with any guardrail (business-rule) violation scores zero, higher is better
59.4%69.5%19 Oct 2026
Design Arena SVG
Elo rating from crowdsourced blind pairwise votes on SVG markup that models generate from a prompt (icons, illustrations, diagrams, artistic compositions), higher is better
1,3001,33219 Oct 2026
EQ-Bench Creative Writing v3
Elo score from LLM-judged pairwise comparisons of creative-writing outputs (rubric score shown alongside), higher is better
2,1622,05024 Sep 2026
LMArena Search Arena (style control)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes on search-grounded answers, style-controlled view), higher is better
1,2331,21113 Oct 2026
LMArena Text Arena (overall, style control)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes, style-controlled default view), higher is better
1,5021,50815 Oct 2026
LMArena Text Arena: Creative Writing (style control)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes, creative-writing prompts only, style-controlled view), higher is better
1,4851,51915 Oct 2026
LMArena Vision Arena (overall, style control)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes on image + text prompts, style-controlled view), higher is better
1,2861,2939 Oct 2026
LMArena WebDev / Code Arena (overall)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes on web-app generation), higher is better
1,7421,80618 Oct 2026
ParseBench (models)
Overall: mean of five rule-based dimension scores (tables, charts, content faithfulness, semantic formatting, visual grounding) on ~2,000 human-verified enterprise pages, higher is better
78.9%79.8%9 Oct 2026