All tasks / Comparisons

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5

Compared only on public benchmark results, across the 8 tasks where both are listed: Claude Fable 5.1 is a tier higher in 4 of 8 shared tasks, Claude Sonnet 5.5 in 2.

Claude Fable 5.1

Anthropic's highest-priced Claude tier, positioned for demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic work.

Vendor
Anthropic
Weights
Closed: API and apps only
Released
1 Sep 2026
API price
$10 in / $50 out per 1M tokens
License
proprietary
Last verified
18 Oct 2026

Alternatives to Claude Fable 5.1

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Anthropic's mid-tier Claude model, described as its best combination of speed and intelligence.

Vendor
Anthropic
Weights
Closed: API and apps only
Released
28 Sep 2026
API price
$2 in / $10 out per 1M tokens
License
proprietary
Last verified
18 Oct 2026

Alternatives to Claude Sonnet 5.5

Task by task

TaskClaude Fable 5.1Claude Sonnet 5.5Higher tier
Chat & assistants
Models
S1,502 on LMArena Text Arena (overall, style control) · CloudA1,475 on LMArena Text Arena (overall, style control) · CloudClaude Fable 5.1
Search & research
Models
S1,233 on LMArena Search Arena (style control) · Cloud–No public result yet · CloudClaude Fable 5.1
Writing
Models
S1,485 on LMArena Text Arena: Creative Writing (style control) · CloudA1,465 on LMArena Text Arena: Creative Writing (style control) · CloudClaude Fable 5.1
Documents & OCR
Models
–No public result yet · Cloud–No public result yet · Cloud—
Coding
Models
A1,742 on LMArena WebDev / Code Arena (overall) · CloudS1,768 on LMArena WebDev / Code Arena (overall) · CloudClaude Sonnet 5.5
Image understanding
Models
S1,286 on LMArena Vision Arena (overall, style control) · CloudA1,266 on LMArena Vision Arena (overall, style control) · CloudClaude Fable 5.1
Browser & computer agents
Models
–No public result yet · Cloud–No public result yet · Cloud—
Workflow automation
Models
C59.4% on AutomationBench-AA (Artificial Analysis) · CloudA71.8% on AutomationBench-AA (Artificial Analysis) · CloudClaude Sonnet 5.5

A tier spans a range of scores, and small gaps on a leaderboard are often within its margin of error, so only a different tier counts as ahead. How we rank.

Same benchmark, both results

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Claude Sonnet 5.5Snapshot
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Composite index over Artificial Analysis' own evaluation suite, higher is better
535618 Oct 2026
AutomationBench-AA (Artificial Analysis)
Score: average share of each task's objectives completed across 657 business-workflow tasks in 40 simulated SaaS apps via REST APIs; a task with any guardrail (business-rule) violation scores zero, higher is better
59.4%71.8%19 Oct 2026
LMArena Text Arena (overall, style control)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes, style-controlled default view), higher is better
1,5021,47515 Oct 2026
LMArena Text Arena: Creative Writing (style control)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes, creative-writing prompts only, style-controlled view), higher is better
1,4851,46515 Oct 2026
LMArena Vision Arena (overall, style control)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes on image + text prompts, style-controlled view), higher is better
1,2861,2669 Oct 2026
LMArena WebDev / Code Arena (overall)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes on web-app generation), higher is better
1,7421,76818 Oct 2026
ParseBench (models)
Overall: mean of five rule-based dimension scores (tables, charts, content faithfulness, semantic formatting, visual grounding) on ~2,000 human-verified enterprise pages, higher is better
78.9%70.2%9 Oct 2026
SWE-Bench Pro V2 (public set, full)
Resolve rate on 642 validated long-horizon tasks from 11 copyleft repositories, re-graded on a pristine image under a locked offline protocol, higher is better
99.1%95.8%19 Oct 2026