All tasks / Comparisons
Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM-5.3
Compared only on public benchmark results, across the 6 tasks where both are listed: Claude Fable 5.1 is a tier higher in 4 of 6 shared tasks, GLM-5.3 in 1, they share a tier in 1.
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic's highest-priced Claude tier, positioned for demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic work.
- Vendor
- Anthropic
- Weights
- Closed: API and apps only
- Released
- 1 Sep 2026
- API price
- $10 in / $50 out per 1M tokens
- License
- proprietary
- Last verified
- 18 Oct 2026
GLM-5.3
Z.ai's open-weights GLM model line for reasoning, coding and agentic tasks.
- Vendor
- Z.ai
- Weights
- Open: run it yourself
- Released
- 14 Aug 2026
- API price
- $1.4 in / $4.4 out per 1M tokens
- GPU memory to run locally
- ~425 GB
- License
- GLM-5.3 License (custom; HF tag 'glm-5.3'; LMArena lists MIT)
- Last verified
- 18 Oct 2026
Task by task
| Task | Claude Fable 5.1 | GLM-5.3 | Higher tier |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chat & assistants Models | S1,502 on LMArena Text Arena (overall, style control) · Cloud | A1,479 on LMArena Text Arena (overall, style control) · Local | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Writing Models | S1,485 on LMArena Text Arena: Creative Writing (style control) · Cloud | A1,453 on LMArena Text Arena: Creative Writing (style control) · Local | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Coding Models | A1,742 on LMArena WebDev / Code Arena (overall) · Cloud | C1,622 on LMArena WebDev / Code Arena (overall) · Local | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Vector graphics & logos Models | C1,300 on Design Arena SVG · Cloud | C1,293 on Design Arena SVG · Local | Same tier |
| Workflow automation Models | C59.4% on AutomationBench-AA (Artificial Analysis) · Cloud | B62.2% on AutomationBench-AA (Artificial Analysis) · Local | GLM-5.3 |
| Slides & presentations Models | S1,328 on Design Arena Python-PPTX Slides · Cloud | A1,255 on Design Arena Python-PPTX Slides · Local | Claude Fable 5.1 |
A tier spans a range of scores, and small gaps on a leaderboard are often within its margin of error, so only a different tier counts as ahead. How we rank.
Same benchmark, both results
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | GLM-5.3 | Snapshot |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index Composite index over Artificial Analysis' own evaluation suite, higher is better | 53 | 45 | 18 Oct 2026 |
| AutomationBench-AA (Artificial Analysis) Score: average share of each task's objectives completed across 657 business-workflow tasks in 40 simulated SaaS apps via REST APIs; a task with any guardrail (business-rule) violation scores zero, higher is better | 59.4% | 62.2% | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Design Arena Python-PPTX Slides Elo rating from crowdsourced blind pairwise votes on PowerPoint decks that models build with python-pptx in Design Arena's agent harness, higher is better | 1,328 | 1,255 | 18 Oct 2026 |
| Design Arena SVG Elo rating from crowdsourced blind pairwise votes on SVG markup that models generate from a prompt (icons, illustrations, diagrams, artistic compositions), higher is better | 1,300 | 1,293 | 19 Oct 2026 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing v3 Elo score from LLM-judged pairwise comparisons of creative-writing outputs (rubric score shown alongside), higher is better | 2,162 | 2,075 | 24 Sep 2026 |
| LMArena Text Arena (overall, style control) Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes, style-controlled default view), higher is better | 1,502 | 1,479 | 15 Oct 2026 |
| LMArena Text Arena: Creative Writing (style control) Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes, creative-writing prompts only, style-controlled view), higher is better | 1,485 | 1,453 | 15 Oct 2026 |
| LMArena WebDev / Code Arena (overall) Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes on web-app generation), higher is better | 1,742 | 1,622 | 18 Oct 2026 |
| SWE-Bench Pro V2 (public set, full) Resolve rate on 642 validated long-horizon tasks from 11 copyleft repositories, re-graded on a pristine image under a locked offline protocol, higher is better | 99.1% | 95.6% | 19 Oct 2026 |