All tasks / Comparisons

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5

Compared only on public benchmark results, across the 8 tasks where both are listed: Claude Opus 5.5 is a tier higher in 4 of 8 shared tasks, they share a tier in 2.

Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic's Opus-tier Claude model for long-running agentic coding and knowledge work.

Vendor
Anthropic
Weights
Closed: API and apps only
Released
22 Sep 2026
API price
$4 in / $20 out per 1M tokens
License
proprietary
Last verified
18 Oct 2026

Alternatives to Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Anthropic's mid-tier Claude model, described as its best combination of speed and intelligence.

Vendor
Anthropic
Weights
Closed: API and apps only
Released
28 Sep 2026
API price
$2 in / $10 out per 1M tokens
License
proprietary
Last verified
18 Oct 2026

Alternatives to Claude Sonnet 5.5

Task by task

TaskClaude Opus 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5Higher tier
Chat & assistants
Models
S1,508 on LMArena Text Arena (overall, style control) · CloudA1,475 on LMArena Text Arena (overall, style control) · CloudClaude Opus 5.5
Search & research
Models
A1,211 on LMArena Search Arena (style control) · Cloud–No public result yet · CloudClaude Opus 5.5
Writing
Models
S1,519 on LMArena Text Arena: Creative Writing (style control) · CloudA1,465 on LMArena Text Arena: Creative Writing (style control) · CloudClaude Opus 5.5
Documents & OCR
Models
–No public result yet · Cloud–No public result yet · Cloud—
Coding
Models
S1,806 on LMArena WebDev / Code Arena (overall) · CloudS1,768 on LMArena WebDev / Code Arena (overall) · CloudSame tier
Image understanding
Models
S1,293 on LMArena Vision Arena (overall, style control) · CloudA1,266 on LMArena Vision Arena (overall, style control) · CloudClaude Opus 5.5
Browser & computer agents
Models
–No public result yet · Cloud–No public result yet · Cloud—
Workflow automation
Models
A69.5% on AutomationBench-AA (Artificial Analysis) · CloudA71.8% on AutomationBench-AA (Artificial Analysis) · CloudSame tier

A tier spans a range of scores, and small gaps on a leaderboard are often within its margin of error, so only a different tier counts as ahead. How we rank.

Same benchmark, both results

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5Snapshot
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Composite index over Artificial Analysis' own evaluation suite, higher is better
585618 Oct 2026
AutomationBench-AA (Artificial Analysis)
Score: average share of each task's objectives completed across 657 business-workflow tasks in 40 simulated SaaS apps via REST APIs; a task with any guardrail (business-rule) violation scores zero, higher is better
69.5%71.8%19 Oct 2026
LMArena Text Arena (overall, style control)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes, style-controlled default view), higher is better
1,5081,47515 Oct 2026
LMArena Text Arena: Creative Writing (style control)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes, creative-writing prompts only, style-controlled view), higher is better
1,5191,46515 Oct 2026
LMArena Vision Arena (overall, style control)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes on image + text prompts, style-controlled view), higher is better
1,2931,2669 Oct 2026
LMArena WebDev / Code Arena (overall)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes on web-app generation), higher is better
1,8061,76818 Oct 2026
ParseBench (models)
Overall: mean of five rule-based dimension scores (tables, charts, content faithfulness, semantic formatting, visual grounding) on ~2,000 human-verified enterprise pages, higher is better
79.8%70.2%9 Oct 2026