All tasks / Comparisons

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

Compared only on public benchmark results, across the 9 tasks where both are listed: Claude Opus 5.5 is a tier higher in 3 of 9 shared tasks, they share a tier in 4.

Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic's Opus-tier Claude model for long-running agentic coding and knowledge work.

Vendor
Anthropic
Weights
Closed: API and apps only
Released
22 Sep 2026
API price
$4 in / $20 out per 1M tokens
License
proprietary
Last verified
18 Oct 2026

Alternatives to Claude Opus 5.5

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Google's Flash tier of faster, lower-cost Gemini models, aimed at agents, coding and high-volume use.

Vendor
Google
Weights
Closed: API and apps only
Released
2 Sep 2026
API price
$0.75 in / $3.75 out per 1M tokens
License
proprietary
Last verified
18 Oct 2026

Alternatives to Gemini 3.8 Flash

Task by task

TaskClaude Opus 5.5Gemini 3.8 FlashHigher tier
Chat & assistants
Models
S1,508 on LMArena Text Arena (overall, style control) · CloudS1,496 on LMArena Text Arena (overall, style control) · CloudSame tier
Search & research
Models
A1,211 on LMArena Search Arena (style control) · Cloud–No public result yet · CloudClaude Opus 5.5
Writing
Models
S1,519 on LMArena Text Arena: Creative Writing (style control) · CloudS1,487 on LMArena Text Arena: Creative Writing (style control) · CloudSame tier
Documents & OCR
Models
–No public result yet · Cloud–No public result yet · Cloud—
Coding
Models
S1,806 on LMArena WebDev / Code Arena (overall) · CloudC1,586 on LMArena WebDev / Code Arena (overall) · CloudClaude Opus 5.5
Image understanding
Models
S1,293 on LMArena Vision Arena (overall, style control) · CloudS1,289 on LMArena Vision Arena (overall, style control) · CloudSame tier
Vector graphics & logos
Models
C1,332 on Design Arena SVG · CloudC1,294 on Design Arena SVG · CloudSame tier
Browser & computer agents
Models
–No public result yet · Cloud–No public result yet · Cloud—
Workflow automation
Models
A69.5% on AutomationBench-AA (Artificial Analysis) · CloudB59.9% on AutomationBench-AA (Artificial Analysis) · CloudClaude Opus 5.5

A tier spans a range of scores, and small gaps on a leaderboard are often within its margin of error, so only a different tier counts as ahead. How we rank.

Same benchmark, both results

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Gemini 3.8 FlashSnapshot
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Composite index over Artificial Analysis' own evaluation suite, higher is better
584118 Oct 2026
Artificial Analysis MMMU-Pro (independent evaluation)
Accuracy on MMMU-Pro (multi-discipline multimodal questions over images), as run by Artificial Analysis, higher is better
87.7%85.6%19 Oct 2026
AutomationBench-AA (Artificial Analysis)
Score: average share of each task's objectives completed across 657 business-workflow tasks in 40 simulated SaaS apps via REST APIs; a task with any guardrail (business-rule) violation scores zero, higher is better
69.5%59.9%19 Oct 2026
Design Arena SVG
Elo rating from crowdsourced blind pairwise votes on SVG markup that models generate from a prompt (icons, illustrations, diagrams, artistic compositions), higher is better
1,3321,29419 Oct 2026
EQ-Bench Creative Writing v3
Elo score from LLM-judged pairwise comparisons of creative-writing outputs (rubric score shown alongside), higher is better
2,0501,74824 Sep 2026
LMArena Text Arena (overall, style control)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes, style-controlled default view), higher is better
1,5081,49615 Oct 2026
LMArena Text Arena: Creative Writing (style control)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes, creative-writing prompts only, style-controlled view), higher is better
1,5191,48715 Oct 2026
LMArena Vision Arena (overall, style control)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes on image + text prompts, style-controlled view), higher is better
1,2931,2899 Oct 2026
LMArena WebDev / Code Arena (overall)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes on web-app generation), higher is better
1,8061,58618 Oct 2026
ParseBench (models)
Overall: mean of five rule-based dimension scores (tables, charts, content faithfulness, semantic formatting, visual grounding) on ~2,000 human-verified enterprise pages, higher is better
79.8%72.1%9 Oct 2026