All tasks / Comparisons

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3

Compared only on public benchmark results, across the 6 tasks where both are listed: Claude Opus 5.5 is a tier higher in 2 of 6 shared tasks, Muse Spark 1.3 in 1, they share a tier in 3.

Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic's Opus-tier Claude model for long-running agentic coding and knowledge work.

Vendor
Anthropic
Weights
Closed: API and apps only
Released
22 Sep 2026
API price
$4 in / $20 out per 1M tokens
License
proprietary
Last verified
18 Oct 2026

Alternatives to Claude Opus 5.5

Muse Spark 1.3

Meta's mid-tier proprietary Muse model line, offered through Meta's API.

Vendor
Meta
Weights
Closed: API and apps only
Released
Sep 2026
API price
$1.25 in / $4.25 out per 1M tokens
License
proprietary
Last verified
18 Oct 2026

Alternatives to Muse Spark 1.3

Task by task

TaskClaude Opus 5.5Muse Spark 1.3Higher tier
Chat & assistants
Models
S1,508 on LMArena Text Arena (overall, style control) · CloudS1,494 on LMArena Text Arena (overall, style control) · CloudSame tier
Writing
Models
S1,519 on LMArena Text Arena: Creative Writing (style control) · CloudA1,461 on LMArena Text Arena: Creative Writing (style control) · CloudClaude Opus 5.5
Coding
Models
S1,806 on LMArena WebDev / Code Arena (overall) · CloudB1,659 on LMArena WebDev / Code Arena (overall) · CloudClaude Opus 5.5
Image understanding
Models
S1,293 on LMArena Vision Arena (overall, style control) · CloudS1,290 on LMArena Vision Arena (overall, style control) · CloudSame tier
Vector graphics & logos
Models
C1,332 on Design Arena SVG · CloudC1,323 on Design Arena SVG · CloudSame tier
Browser & computer agents
Models
–No public result yet · CloudA39.3% on OSWorld 2.0 (end-to-end models) · CloudMuse Spark 1.3

A tier spans a range of scores, and small gaps on a leaderboard are often within its margin of error, so only a different tier counts as ahead. How we rank.

Same benchmark, both results

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Muse Spark 1.3Snapshot
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Composite index over Artificial Analysis' own evaluation suite, higher is better
584818 Oct 2026
Artificial Analysis MMMU-Pro (independent evaluation)
Accuracy on MMMU-Pro (multi-discipline multimodal questions over images), as run by Artificial Analysis, higher is better
87.7%82%19 Oct 2026
Design Arena SVG
Elo rating from crowdsourced blind pairwise votes on SVG markup that models generate from a prompt (icons, illustrations, diagrams, artistic compositions), higher is better
1,3321,32319 Oct 2026
EQ-Bench Creative Writing v3
Elo score from LLM-judged pairwise comparisons of creative-writing outputs (rubric score shown alongside), higher is better
2,0501,90624 Sep 2026
LMArena Text Arena (overall, style control)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes, style-controlled default view), higher is better
1,5081,49415 Oct 2026
LMArena Text Arena: Creative Writing (style control)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes, creative-writing prompts only, style-controlled view), higher is better
1,5191,46115 Oct 2026
LMArena Vision Arena (overall, style control)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes on image + text prompts, style-controlled view), higher is better
1,2931,2909 Oct 2026
LMArena WebDev / Code Arena (overall)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes on web-app generation), higher is better
1,8061,65918 Oct 2026