All tasks / Comparisons

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8-Max

Compared only on public benchmark results, across the 6 tasks where both are listed: Claude Opus 5.5 is a tier higher in 4 of 6 shared tasks, Qwen3.8-Max in 1, they share a tier in 1.

Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic's Opus-tier Claude model for long-running agentic coding and knowledge work.

Vendor
Anthropic
Weights
Closed: API and apps only
Released
22 Sep 2026
API price
$4 in / $20 out per 1M tokens
License
proprietary
Last verified
18 Oct 2026

Alternatives to Claude Opus 5.5

Qwen3.8-Max

Alibaba's hosted Qwen3.8-Max: the API version takes text, image and video input with a 1M-token context.

Vendor
Alibaba (Qwen)
Weights
Closed: API and apps only
Released
2 Aug 2026
API price
$2 in / $6 out per 1M tokens (Alibaba Cloud Model Studio list price quoted by The Batch (cached input $0.25/1M); OpenRouter lists the same for the qwen3.8-max-0902 snapshot. The higher-throughput 'Max Prime' SKU (2026-09-23) costs $4/$12.)
License
proprietary
Last verified
18 Oct 2026

Alternatives to Qwen3.8-Max

Task by task

TaskClaude Opus 5.5Qwen3.8-MaxHigher tier
Chat & assistants
Models
S1,508 on LMArena Text Arena (overall, style control) · CloudA1,482 on LMArena Text Arena (overall, style control) · CloudClaude Opus 5.5
Search & research
Models
A1,211 on LMArena Search Arena (style control) · CloudS1,230 on LMArena Search Arena (style control) · CloudQwen3.8-Max
Writing
Models
S1,519 on LMArena Text Arena: Creative Writing (style control) · CloudA1,469 on LMArena Text Arena: Creative Writing (style control) · CloudClaude Opus 5.5
Coding
Models
S1,806 on LMArena WebDev / Code Arena (overall) · CloudB1,674 on LMArena WebDev / Code Arena (overall) · CloudClaude Opus 5.5
Image understanding
Models
S1,293 on LMArena Vision Arena (overall, style control) · CloudS1,301 on LMArena Vision Arena (overall, style control) · CloudSame tier
Workflow automation
Models
A69.5% on AutomationBench-AA (Artificial Analysis) · CloudC56.2% on AutomationBench-AA (Artificial Analysis) · CloudClaude Opus 5.5

A tier spans a range of scores, and small gaps on a leaderboard are often within its margin of error, so only a different tier counts as ahead. How we rank.

Same benchmark, both results

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Qwen3.8-MaxSnapshot
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Composite index over Artificial Analysis' own evaluation suite, higher is better
584519 Oct 2026
Artificial Analysis MMMU-Pro (independent evaluation)
Accuracy on MMMU-Pro (multi-discipline multimodal questions over images), as run by Artificial Analysis, higher is better
87.7%82.8%19 Oct 2026
AutomationBench-AA (Artificial Analysis)
Score: average share of each task's objectives completed across 657 business-workflow tasks in 40 simulated SaaS apps via REST APIs; a task with any guardrail (business-rule) violation scores zero, higher is better
69.5%56.2%19 Oct 2026
LMArena Search Arena (style control)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes on search-grounded answers, style-controlled view), higher is better
1,2111,23013 Oct 2026
LMArena Text Arena (overall, style control)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes, style-controlled default view), higher is better
1,5081,48215 Oct 2026
LMArena Text Arena: Creative Writing (style control)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes, creative-writing prompts only, style-controlled view), higher is better
1,5191,46915 Oct 2026
LMArena Vision Arena (overall, style control)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes on image + text prompts, style-controlled view), higher is better
1,2931,3019 Oct 2026
LMArena WebDev / Code Arena (overall)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes on web-app generation), higher is better
1,8061,67418 Oct 2026