All tasks / Comparisons

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.7-Plus

Compared only on public benchmark results, across the 6 tasks where both are listed: Muse Spark 1.3 is a tier higher in 4 of 6 shared tasks, they share a tier in 2.

Muse Spark 1.3

Meta's mid-tier proprietary Muse model line, offered through Meta's API.

Vendor
Meta
Weights
Closed: API and apps only
Released
Sep 2026
API price
$1.25 in / $4.25 out per 1M tokens
License
proprietary
Last verified
18 Oct 2026

Alternatives to Muse Spark 1.3

Qwen3.7-Plus

Alibaba's closed mid-tier Qwen API model on Model Studio, below Qwen-Max in price.

Vendor
Alibaba (Qwen)
Weights
Closed: API and apps only
API price
$0.32 in / $1.28 out per 1M tokens (OpenRouter listed price; official Model Studio price not confirmed)
Last verified
19 Oct 2026

Alternatives to Qwen3.7-Plus

Task by task

TaskMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.7-PlusHigher tier
Chat & assistants
Models
S1,494 on LMArena Text Arena (overall, style control) · CloudA1,456 on LMArena Text Arena (overall, style control) · CloudMuse Spark 1.3
Writing
Models
A1,461 on LMArena Text Arena: Creative Writing (style control) · CloudA1,432 on LMArena Text Arena: Creative Writing (style control) · CloudSame tier
Coding
Models
B1,659 on LMArena WebDev / Code Arena (overall) · CloudC25 on Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · CloudMuse Spark 1.3
Image understanding
Models
S1,290 on LMArena Vision Arena (overall, style control) · CloudA1,264 on LMArena Vision Arena (overall, style control) · CloudMuse Spark 1.3
Vector graphics & logos
Models
C1,323 on Design Arena SVG · CloudC1,208 on Design Arena SVG · CloudSame tier
Browser & computer agents
Models
A39.3% on OSWorld 2.0 (end-to-end models) · CloudC2.8% on OSWorld 2.0 (end-to-end models) · CloudMuse Spark 1.3

A tier spans a range of scores, and small gaps on a leaderboard are often within its margin of error, so only a different tier counts as ahead. How we rank.

Same benchmark, both results

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.7-PlusSnapshot
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Composite index over Artificial Analysis' own evaluation suite, higher is better
482519 Oct 2026
Artificial Analysis MMMU-Pro (independent evaluation)
Accuracy on MMMU-Pro (multi-discipline multimodal questions over images), as run by Artificial Analysis, higher is better
82%80.5%19 Oct 2026
Design Arena SVG
Elo rating from crowdsourced blind pairwise votes on SVG markup that models generate from a prompt (icons, illustrations, diagrams, artistic compositions), higher is better
1,3231,20819 Oct 2026
LMArena Text Arena (overall, style control)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes, style-controlled default view), higher is better
1,4941,45615 Oct 2026
LMArena Text Arena: Creative Writing (style control)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes, creative-writing prompts only, style-controlled view), higher is better
1,4611,43215 Oct 2026
LMArena Vision Arena (overall, style control)
Arena score (Bradley-Terry rating from pairwise human votes on image + text prompts, style-controlled view), higher is better
1,2901,2649 Oct 2026
OSWorld 2.0 (end-to-end models)
Binary accuracy: share of 108 long-horizon computer-use workflows fully completed (default view: 500-step budget, full task set), higher is better
39.3%2.8%15 Oct 2026